However, it is clear that someone really wants those facilities. As you come to scan the available extensions you will realise that 95%+ of them are of absolutely no interest whatever to you. Maybe the power of T-bird is in the Add-ons, which of course novice users will struggle with. The main value of a POP client as opposed to clunky webmail clients, is the automatic, no user interaction required, extraction of attachments. Markxyz wrote:But I still don't understand what folks were thinking when they designed the baseline T-bird attachment handling. Thanks for that.īut I still don't understand what folks were thinking when they designed the baseline T-bird attachment handling. It's not perfect, but at least you found a workable solution to my problem. It generates extra files with cryptic names from signatures in addition to the correct file with the attachment. I did try this Add-on and it does sorta work. Here I'm thinking of the Lexmark scandal where their SW sent a copy of what you were printing back to some company to "help improve print performance". Of course, I never specifically searched Add-ons, mostly because I'm not sure which ones are to be trusted. I executed a dozen searches and never found it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |